Board Size

Vote FOR proposals seeking to fix the board size or designate a range for the board size.

Vote AGAINST proposals that give management the ability to alter the size of the board outside of a specified range without shareholder approval.

Discussion

Proposals to allow management to increase or decrease the size of the board at its own discretion are often used by companies as a takeover defense. Since directors are the shareholders' agents, and votes on directors are the most fundamental shareholder right, the corporate governance system should allow shareholders the same rights given to management, to expand the scope of the board, or to contract it, if they wish.

Shareholders should support management proposals to fix the size of the board at a specific number of directors, thus preventing management from increasing board size in the face of a proxy contest without shareholder approval. By increasing the size of the board, management can make it more difficult for dissidents to gain control. Fixing the size of the board also prevents a reduction in the board size as a means to oust independent directors or those who cause friction within an otherwise homogenous board. Finally, fixing the board size prevents management from increasing the number of directors in order to dilute the effects of cumulative voting.


 
 

© 2005 Institutional Shareholder Services. All Rights Reserved.
ISS' Corporate Programs Division offers products and services (described on ISS' website) to issuers of proxy solicitations consisting primarily of advisory and analytical services, self-assessment tools and publications. ISS has adopted a number of policies and practices to guard against any possible conflicts of interest between our institutional proxy advisory service and our corporate services. Please see ISS' Business Policies for further information.